Morality

A code of conduct is always necessary when prospective new members are to be introduced to, and inducted into, an existing culture.

The maintenance of associated expectations is also necessary.

With or without a code of conduct to follow, you have a moral duty to make the world a much better place than it would be without you, regardless of your access to money.

In the minds of rich, rude Australians, and rich, rude persons more generally, the possession of money is a sign of moral superiority. 

Yet there are many confusions about the possession of money and what that possession really means in practice.

There is nothing moral about the possession of money.

There is nothing moral about the absence of money in a person's life, either.

How much time do you devote each day towards assessing and developing moral intelligence, in yourself as well as other people, and what approach do you prefer to take?

You may be aware that moral development is only partly associated with the natural journey to maturity over time.

Moral development is, more importantly, associated with cultural experiences, and personal choices, at various times in a person's life.

Are you sure you are capable of performing a quality analysis of events in relation to morality and immorality?

How do you assess the structure of your own morality? 

How have you, in fact, acquired knowledge of morality?

When people are unaware of the truth about the comparative comforts and excesses within their own existence, how is it possible for them to learn to live more simply, peacefully and thoughtfully? 

How do you attempt to ensure journalists become better informed about disability and civility, especially in relation to democracy, morality and good governance? 

Perhaps you usually consider journalism, politics, finance and entertainment to involve a spectrum of positions from high morality to considerable immorality.

How do you assess the meaning of law in relation to the meaning of morality?

Perhaps you do not even regard the rule of law to be associated with pleasantness.

You may possibly associate laws with confusion, injustice and instruction creep.

After all, laws are principally formed in legislatures by persons of dubious principle.

Civility is generally expressed through investing in peacefully authentic living.

How are you already investing in such a way of life, and where is your proof?

If you have been investing in the quality analysis of events, what have you received as a return on that investment?

The right to vote and the right to refuse to cast a ballot are both expressions of the right to practice political dissent

Civility always demands the most peaceful and dignified expressions of dissent and the most reasonable and well-informed expressions of consent.

You may be interested in investing in a sense of belonging through this publication.

You may regard that possibility as very good news indeed.

How do your moral principles relate to democracy, history and civility?

If you are interested in investing in peace through civility, empathy and democracy, what will be your main priorities over the months ahead, and why?

What do you know about freedom and morality in relation to the principle of least interest

How do you assess fossil fuel production, distribution and use in relation to morality?

 

 

How are your expressions of morality connected with urgently addressing immorality?

How have you been investing in suitably clear boundaries, and for whose benefit?
 
What have your contributions to quality democracies already achieved, and where is your proof?
 
How do you to tell the difference between leading through knowledge and misleading through opinion?

If you still have an association with one or more untrustworthy organisations, why do you do so?

If you still interact with one or more untrustworthy persons, why do you waste your time that way?

If you are seeking to present yourself as an honest political candidate, who already supports you, and why?

How independently and morally do you conduct your research?

How independently do you decide upon your research pursuits?

Who, if anyone, attempts to direct your research practices against your own wishes? 
 
Who, if anyone, attempts to influence the reporting of your results?

 
How do you attempt to maintain civility and integrity if not through the maintenance of suitably high standards?
 
How has your creativity been expressed over the last twelve years, digitally, physically and morally, and why?

How creatively are you addressing unpleasantness in the present?

How well are you investing in enlightened beings?

How are you using your knowledge of problems to support a landslide win for highly creative, courteous and empathic persons as political representatives?

What do you know about banking in relation to morality?

What do you know about morality in relation to banking? 

What do you know about morality in relation to loyalty?

What do you know about moral responsibility in relation to integrity and civility?

Perhaps you do not regard integrity and civility to be universally-relevant concepts.

Comments