Legacy

What will your legacy be?

Will it be a protective one or a dangerous one?

Will it be one reflective of justice or one reflective of injustice?

Will it be one reflective of good planning or one reflective of the opposite?

If you wish to be remembered for a good legacy, what will it be, and who will implement it?

What have you already provided the world as a civility legacy?

What sort of inheritance have you received, and why?

What sort of inheritance do you expect to receive, and why?

What sort of inheritance do you expect to leave behind, and for whose benefit?

Who deserves to inherit from you, and how?

How do you tell the difference between a useful legacy and a useless, or even, problematic, one?

What are you seeking to bequeath in support of the second Age of Enlightenment, and how will you do so?

Many areas of the world, including in Australia, have been or become disaster zones, with or without adequate local government planning laws.  

 

It is impossible to live comfortably in such zones, in a sustainable way, especially when scientific predictions reveal that environmental disasters are likely to reoccur with uncomfortable frequency.

It is often difficult to live comfortably in political border zones.

It is impossible to live comfortably in military exclusion zones or in any areas where military activities are occurring or are soon likely to occur or where the dangerous legacy of military activities is dangerously scattered around.

The world has no-fly zones and no-go zones and demilitarised zones.

The world also has conservation zones and sacrificed zones.

Such zones are politically determined.

 

How do you assess and protect the cultural and natural heritage you value?

 

Who deserves to benefit from that heritage, and who does not? 

Who has been destroying the heritage you value, and why?

 

How do you decide whether to invest in the continuation of any sort of activity or routine or plan, particularly as a legacy you regard as important?