Discussions
How are you investing in thoughtful discussions about the world and various experiences within it?
Where and when, if at all, have you been attending thoughtful discussion about investing in simple living?
Civility is intended to encourage open and honest communication, thoughtful discussions and simply wonderful lives.
How are you investing in suitable independence for the benefit of yourself and other people?
Who has been investing in you, and how, and where, and why, and when?
Where, if anywhere, have you been involved in discussions about possible ways to improve civility in the world, particularly political civility?
How carefully do you assess your thoughts, feelings, needs, preferences, intentions and goals during and after various discussions?
How attentive are you towards other people's thoughts, feelings, needs, preferences, intentions and goals, before, during and after discussions, and why?
Perhaps you have been discussing the initial contents of Civility Today with a few of the persons with whom you feel most compatible:
How do you usually assess compatibility?
What have you most recently discussed with one or more persons with whom you are incompatible?
Perhaps you regard people with disgust if you perceive them as incompatible with you.
Perhaps you have been conducting conversations, discussions and/or debates on the history of civility in Australia and other societies.
Perhaps you have been conducting conversations, discussions and/or debates on the history of political campaigns in Australia and other societies.
How do you usually assess your contributions to discussions in relation to civility?
How do you usually assess your contributions to discussions on the topic of contributions?
- Contributions - Part One
- Contributions - Part Two
- Contributions - Part Three
- Contributions - Part Four
- Contributions - Part Five
- Contributions - Part Six
- Contributions - Part Seven
- Contributions - Part Eight
How do you tell the difference between a tedious argument and an enlightening discussion?
How do you prefer to face reality, and why?
How do you prefer to respond to disagreements?
Perhaps you prefer to avoid thoughtful discussions, with anyone.
Perhaps you do not know the difference between a thoughtful discussion, competitive chatter, an aggressive debate and a pleasant conversation.
Appropriate discussions can only occur within the context of goodness and authentic living.
With whom have you most recently discussed ways to develop good policy?
With whom have you most recently discussed ways to encourage good behaviour?
Perhaps you spend much of your time discussing topics you regard as disgusting.
Perhaps you prefer to use language other people regard as disgusting.
Where, if anywhere, have you participated in Adagia discussions recently, particularly in relation to translating words and interpreting meanings?
Where and when have you most recently attended a discussion about investing in awareness?
How is it possible to converse with people when they do not know how to talk about anything but their narrow experiences, biased opinions and muddled interpretation of the world?
How is it possible to have peace in the world when governments are
aggressive, policy debates are aggressive, political interviewers are
aggressive, political interviewees are aggressive, and even election campaigns are aggressive?
You currently have access to Civility Today exclusively through the digital library of Frugality Cottage.
Are you currently eligible to attend the virtual discussions in the sitting room of the cottage?
Comments
Post a Comment